### You are viewing a page indexed by search engine. All comments on the topic are put together without order and may be confusing to read. To see organized discussion click here. ###

There shouldnt need to be catagorisations of being abusive, it should just be identified instictivley as being cruel and wrong. This study of isms is what might be called 'The Ismic Science' It's not functional thinking for most of us---- Thinking more broadly, intellectualism may eventually prove 'society' to be a relatively small concept These personally tailored concepts could apply to broader, modular ideas of society when functions are found for informational association. Typological groupings of these 'ismic symbols' could be used as classification or logo-type groups to define the nature of intellectual capitalFor example, AIs or parsers could produce personally tailored concepts to fit into 'aggregate' or 'engendered' concepts of personal interface, complexified by genetics or personality surveysDoes producing more isms suggest progress for humanity, for example technologically or socially? Could isms be artificially produced to increase intellectual capital?