Anonymous Internet Discussion Forum



Category:

Crime and Punishment




print this page


### You are viewing a page indexed by search engine. All comments on the topic are put together without order and may be confusing to read. To see organized discussion, please visit the real page at above link. ###

Do you believe a jury is really the most reliable group to sentence a person?



That is an excellent question. Honestly, I was thinking what would I do if I was called for 'Jury Duty' in some more serious case (criminal case). Proof would really have to be rock solid (like a video tape with accused taped killing/raping a victim). Otherwise, I would have difficulty in giving a 'Guilty' vote. Sentences depend on the current social norms. Social norms determine how most people think about things. Therefore, a sample of such 'ordinary' people may give a reliable sentence weighted by the current views of the society. Honestly, I do not feel that a jury is the best group to determine someone's innocence. If the jury is able to lie about a grudge they have with someone they could easily convince the rest that the defendant is guilty, truthfully, many people just assume that if someone is on trial they're guilty



Click me!

Expand a current thought with...

When many ideas are present, some may be out of the screen, to the right ... ---->


copyleft © 2007 - Please mention: "Alternative ideas at explore-ideas.com" - About - Terms of use